Empirical evaluation of a process to increase consensus in group architectural decision making
作者: Dan TofanMatthias GalsterIoanna LytraParis AvgeriouUwe ZdunMark-Anthony FoucheRemco de BoerFritz Solms
作者单位: 1Department of Mathematics and Computing Science, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
2Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
3Faculty of Computer Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
4Department of Computer Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
5ArchiXL, XL&Knowledge, Netherlands
刊名: Information and Software Technology, 2016, Vol.72 , pp.31-47
来源数据库: Elsevier Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2015.12.002
关键词: Software architectureGroup architecture decisionsDecision making
原始语种摘要: Abstract(#br)Context(#br)Many software architectural decisions are group decisions rather than decisions made by individuals. Consensus in a group of decision makers increases the acceptance of a decision among decision makers and their confidence in that decision. Furthermore, going through the process of reaching consensus means that decision makers understand better the decision (including the decision topic, decision options, rationales, and potential outcomes). Little guidance exists on how to increase consensus in group architectural decision making.(#br)Objective(#br)We evaluate how a newly proposed process (named GADGET) helps architects increase consensus when making group architectural decisions. Specifically, we investigate how well GADGET increases consensus in group...
全文获取路径: Elsevier  (合作)
分享到:
来源刊物:
影响因子:1.522 (2012)

×