Are the Current Outcome Measurement Tools Appropriate for the Evaluation of the Knee Status in Deep Flexion Range?
作者: Chul-Won HaYong-Beom ParkYoung-Suk SongWon-Young LeeYong-Geun Park
作者单位: 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, South Korea
刊名: The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2016, Vol.31 (1), pp.87-91
来源数据库: Elsevier Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.07.015
关键词: outcomemeasurement toolappropriatenessdeep flexion rangetotal knee arthroplasty
原始语种摘要: Abstract(#br)We determined whether current outcome measurement tools are appropriate for the evaluation of the knee status in deep flexion range after TKA. Patients (n = 604) with more than 120° of knee flexion were evaluated by Knee Society score, WOMAC, and high flexion knee score (HFKS). The appropriateness of measurement tools was analyzed by correlation analyses and group comparisons (group 1: 120°–129°, group 2: 130°–139°, group 3: 140°–150°). HFKS showed stronger correlation with knee flexion compared with other scores. While other scores only differentiated between groups 2 and 3, HFKS could differentiate among groups 1, 2 and 3. These findings suggest that employment of proper outcome measurement tool is needed to evaluate and differentiate the knee status in deep flexion range...
全文获取路径: Elsevier  (合作)
分享到:
来源刊物:
影响因子:2.11 (2012)

×