Evidence of a different landing strategy in subjects with chronic ankle instability
作者: Christophe EechauteRoel De RidderTom MaesDavid BeckwéeEva SwinnenRonald BuylPeter Vaes
作者单位: 1Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
2Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan, 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
3Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Universiteit Gent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Gent, Belgium
刊名: Gait & Posture, 2017, Vol.52 , pp.62-67
来源数据库: Elsevier Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.11.002
关键词: Ankle instabilityBalanceHop testPostural strategyValidity
原始语种摘要: Abstract(#br)The purpose of the study is to evaluate the discriminative validity of the multiple hop test (MHT) for chronic ankle instability (CAI). The dynamic postural control of 51 CAI subjects and 52 uninjured controls was assessed using the MHT. To evaluate dynamic postural control, the type and number of balance errors were analysed and the time to complete the MHT was measured. Between-group differences of time scores and balance errors, identified as being change-in-support strategy errors (CSS) or fixed-support strategy errors (FSS), were assessed. The area under curve of the outcomes was determined and likelihood ratios (LRs) were calculated based upon their most optimal cut off point. When compared to uninjured controls, CAI subjects needed significantly more time to perform...
全文获取路径: Elsevier  (合作)
分享到:
来源刊物:
影响因子:1.969 (2012)

×