Carotid Wallstent Versus Roadsaver Stent and Distal Versus Proximal Protection on Cerebral Microembolization During Carotid Artery Stenting
颈动脉支架置入术中颈动脉壁支架与道路保护支架对脑微栓塞的保护作用
作者: Piero MontorsiLuigi CaputiStefano GalliPaolo M. RavagnaniGiovanni TeruzziAndrea AnnoniGiuseppe CalligarisFranco FabbiocchiDaniela TrabattoniStefano de MartiniLuca GranciniGianluca PontoneDaniele AndreiniSarah TroianoDavide RestelliAntonio L. Bartorelli
作者单位: 1Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
2Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
3Department of Cerebrovascular Disease, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico “C. Besta,” Milan, Italy
刊名: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2020, Vol.13 (4), pp.403-414
来源数据库: Elsevier Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.09.007
关键词: Double-mesh carotid stentMicroembolic signalsProximal protectionTranscranial Doppler
英文摘要: Abstract(#br)Objectives(#br)The aim of this study was to randomly compare the double-layer Roadsaver stent (RS) (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) with the single-layer Carotid Wallstent (CW) (Boston Scientific, Santa Clara, California) in association with either distal embolic protection with the FilterWire (FW) device (Boston Scientific) or proximal protection with the Mo.Ma Ultra device (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, California) in patients with lipid-rich carotid plaques.(#br)Background(#br)The role of both stent type and brain protection during carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains unsettled.(#br)Methods(#br)A total of 104 consecutive patients with carotid artery stenosis were randomized to CAS with FW + RS (group 1, n = 27), FW + CW (group 2, n = 25), Mo.Ma + RS (group 3, n = 27), or Mo.Ma + CW (group...
全文获取路径: Elsevier  (合作)
分享到:
来源刊物:
影响因子:6.552 (2012)

×