作者: | David B. Nelson, Reza J. Mehran, Kyle G. Mitchell, Ravi Rajaram, Arlene M. Correa, Roland L. Bassett, Mara B. Antonoff, Wayne L. Hofstetter, Jack A. Roth, Boris Sepesi, Stephen G. Swisher, Garrett L. Walsh, Ara A. Vaporciyan, David C. Rice |
作者单位: |
1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 2Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas |
刊名: | The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2019, Vol.108 (2), pp.370-376 |
来源数据库: | Elsevier Journal |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.03.051 |
英文摘要: | Background(#br)It is unclear whether the enhanced dexterity and visualization of the surgical robot lessens morbidity and influences staging or survival. We compared outcomes of robotic-assisted lobectomy (RAL) with thoracoscopic video-assisted lobectomy (VAL) or open lobectomy (OL) of non-small cell lung cancer.(#br)Methods(#br)Using a prospective surgical database, perioperative and cancer-related outcomes of patients who received a lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer from 2011 to 2017 were analyzed. Outcomes between each surgical approach were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting generated from the inverse of the propensity score.(#br)Results(#br)There were 831 patients: 106 RAL, 301 VAL, and 424 OL. More RAL patients than VAL received neoadjuvant therapy (16%... |