Comparison of skin closure techniques in patients undergoing open pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single center experience
作者: K.F. FlickR.E. SimpsonM. SoufiM.L. FennertyM.T. Yip-SchneiderC.L. ColgateE.P. CeppaM.G. HouseN.J. ZyromskiA. NakeebC.M. Schmidt
作者单位: 1Department of Surgery, Indianapolis, IN, USA
2Department of Biochemistry/Molecular Biology, Indianapolis, IN, USA
3Department of Center for Outcomes Research in Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
4Department of Walther Oncology Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
5Department of Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
6Department of Indiana University Health Pancreatic Cyst and Cancer Early Detection Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
刊名: The American Journal of Surgery, 2020
来源数据库: Elsevier Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.02.023
英文摘要: Abstract(#br)Background(#br)This study evaluated closure techniques and incisional surgical site complications (SSCs) and incisional surgical site infections (SSIs) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).(#br)Methods(#br)Retrospective review of open PDs from 2015 to 2018 was performed. Outcomes were compared among closure techniques (subcuticular + topical skin adhesive (TSA); staples; subcuticular only). SSCs were defined as abscess, cellulitis, seroma, or fat necrosis. SSIs were defined according to the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP).(#br)Results(#br)Patients with subcuticular + TSA (n = 205) were less likely to develop an incisional SSC (9.8%) compared to staples (n = 139) (20.1%) and subcuticular (n = 74) (16.2%) on univariable analysis (P = 0.024). Multivariable...
全文获取路径: Elsevier  (合作)
影响因子:2.516 (2012)

  • closure 闭合
  • center 中心
  • experience 体验
  • single 单独的