Collaborating in decision making of sustainable building design: An experimental study comparing CBA and WRC methods
作者: Paz ArroyoCamila FuenzalidaAlex AlbertMatthew R. Hallowell
作者单位: 1Dept. of Construction Engineering, Management, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Engineering School, Santiago 7820436, Chile
2Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., 2501 Stinson Dr., Raleigh, NC 27607, United States
3Dept. of Construction Engineering and Management, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, United States
刊名: Energy & Buildings, 2016, Vol.128 , pp.132-142
来源数据库: Elsevier Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.079
关键词: Decision-makingChoosing by advantagesCBASustainabilityDesign managementMultiple baseline testing
原始语种摘要: Abstract(#br)This study compares Choosing By Advantages (CBA) and Weighting Rating and Calculating (WRC) as Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods in how they support collaboration in groups, particularly pertaining to design decisions involving sustainability factors in architecture, engineering and construction industry.(#br)This study is based on an experiment done with 15 practitioners, where they formed 5 groups of 3 people each. The experiment used multiple baseline testing (MBT) and all groups made 12 decisions. The initial decisions were made using the WRC method and later, in a staggered manner between the fifth and ninth decision, the groups were taught to apply the CBA method. The CBA method is considered to be the intervention in the experimental design. Four...
全文获取路径: Elsevier  (合作)
影响因子:2.679 (2012)

  • decision 决定
  • making 制定
  • sustainable 能保持一定速度的
  • CBA Cargo Boarding Advisory
  • design 设计
  • management 管理
  • experimental 实验的
  • construction 构造
  • building 大楼
  • reaching 舷侧迎风