A new method for applying choosing by advantages (CBA) multicriteria decision to a large number of design alternatives
作者: Paz ArroyoClaudio MourguesForest FlagerMaría Gabriela Correa
作者单位: 1Assisstant Professor Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
2Research Associate and Lecturer, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
3Construction Engineering and Management Department, School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
刊名: Energy & Buildings, 2018, Vol.167 , pp.30-37
来源数据库: Elsevier Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.031
关键词: Choosing by advantagesCBAMulti-criteria decision makingMCDMDecision supportMultidisciplinary design optimizationMDO
原始语种摘要: Abstract(#br)The design of buildings, civil infrastructure and other complex systems in our built environment involves considering many, often conflicting, design criteria. Architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) project teams often use multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods to help them arrive at a preferred design solution. An emergent MCDM method in practice today is Choosing by Advantages (CBA) which has been successfully applied to many AEC projects. This method has several benefits over traditional MCDM methods (such as the weighted sum): CBA does not allow to hide a compensation of money for value, CBA helps differentiate between alternatives based on the decision context, CBA reduces time to reach consensus, and it manages better subjective trade-offs by basing...
全文获取路径: Elsevier  (合作)
分享到:
来源刊物:
影响因子:2.679 (2012)

×
关键词翻译
关键词翻译
  • alternatives 代替案
  • CBA Cargo Boarding Advisory
  • criteria 准则
  • decision 决定
  • design 设计
  • applying 施加
  • representative 代理的
  • generalized 广义
  • clustering 聚类
  • applied 应用的