A comparison between the Compass fundus perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer
作者: Giovanni MontesanoSusan R. BryanDavid P. CrabbPaolo FogagnoloFrancesco OddoneAllison M. McKendrickAndrew TurpinPaolo LanzettaAndrea PerdicchiChris A. JohnsonDavid F. Garway-HeathPaolo BrusiniLuca M. Rossetti
作者单位: 1University of Milan – ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
2City, University of London - Optometry and Visual Sciences, London, United Kingdom
3NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
4G.B. Bietti Eye Foundation-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
5University of Melbourne, Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Melbourne, Australia
6University of Melbourne, School of Computing and Information System, Melbourne, Australia
7Department of Medical and Biological Sciences, Ophthalmology Unit, University of Udine, Udine - Italy
8Ophthalmology Unit, St. Andrea Hospital, NESMOS Department, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy
9Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
10Department of Ophthalmology, “Città di Udine” Health Center, Udine, Italy
刊名: Ophthalmology, 2018
来源数据库: Elsevier Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.08.010
英文摘要: Abstract(#br)Purpose(#br)To evaluate relative diagnostic precision and test retest variability of two devices, the Compass (CMP, CenterVue, Italy) fundus perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA, Zeiss, Dublin), in detecting glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON).(#br)Design(#br)Multicentre cross-sectional case–control study.(#br)Subjects(#br)We sequentially enrolled 499 glaucoma patients and 444 normal subjects to analyse relative precision. A separate group of 44 glaucoma patients and 54 normal subjects was analysed to assess test – retest variability.(#br)Methods(#br)One eye of the recruited subjects was tested with the index tests: HFA (SITA Standard strategy) and CMP (ZEST strategy) with a 24-2 grid. The reference test for GON was specialist evaluation of fundus photographs or...
全文获取路径: Elsevier  (合作)
影响因子:5.563 (2012)

  • perimeter 周长
  • comparison 比较
  • between 在中间
  • fundus