Comparison of the efficacy of three cervical collars in restricting cervical range of motion: A randomized study
作者: Jae Guk KimSung Hwan BangGu Hyun KangYong Soo JangWonhee KimHyun Young ChoiGyoung Mo Kim
作者单位: 1Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2Department of Special Warfare Medical Non-Commissioned Officer, Daejeon Health Institute of Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Graduate School of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
4Department of Physical Therapy, Daejeon Health Institute of Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
刊名: Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2020, Vol.27 (1), pp.24-29
来源数据库: Sage Publications, Inc.
DOI: 10.1177/1024907918809499
关键词: Cervical vertebraeImmobilizationTrauma
原始语种摘要: Background:(#br)The cervical collar has been used as a common device for the initial stabilization of the cervical spine. Although many cervical collars are commercially available, there is no consensus on which offers the greatest protection, with studies showing considerable variations in their ability to restrict cervical range of motion. The use of the XCollar (Emegear, Carpinteria, CA) has been known to decrease the risk of spinal cord injury by minimizing potential cervical spinal distraction. We compared XCollar with two other cervical collars commonly used for adult patients with cervical spine injury to evaluate the difference in effectiveness between the three cervical collars to restrict cervical range of motion.(#br)Objectives:(#br)This study aimed to evaluate the difference...
全文获取路径: Sage国际出版集团  (合作)
分享到:

×
关键词翻译
关键词翻译
  • cervical 颈的
  • motion 运动
  • range 射程
  • bilateral 双边的
  • flexion 弯曲
  • three 
  • spine 火山碑
  • restricting 限制
  • study 学习
  • efficacy 效验