作者: | Hanna Schröder, Alexandra Henke, Lina Stieger, Stefan Beckers, Henning Biermann, Rolf Rossaint, Saša Sopka |
作者单位: |
11 Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany 2 2 Aachen Interdisciplinary Training Centre for Medical Education, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany 3 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Hermann-Josef-Hospital, Erkelenz, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany 4 4 Department of Internal Medicine, Agaplesion Elisabethenstift, Darmstadt, Hesse, Germany |
刊名: | PLOS ONE, 2017, Vol.12 (5) |
来源数据库: | PLOS |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0178210 |
原始语种摘要: | Learning and training basic life support (BLS)—especially external chest compressions (ECC) within the BLS-algorithm—are essential resuscitation training for laypersons as well as for health care professionals. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of learning styles on the performance of BLS and to identify whether all types of learners are sufficiently addressed by Peyton’s four-step approach for BLS training.;;A study group of first-year medical students (n = 334) without previous medical knowledge was categorized according to learning styles using the German Lernstilinventar questionnaire based on Kolb’s Learning Styles Inventory. Students’ BLS performances were assessed before and after a four-step BLS training approach lasting 4 hours. Standardized BLS training... |