Pulp response conventional GIC versus Calcium hydroxide (CaOH) cement [October 25, 2018]
作者: Steffen Mickenautsch
刊名: Journal of Minimum Intervention in Dentistry, 2019, Vol.12 (6), pp.97-100
来源数据库: Minimum Intervention in Dentistry
关键词: Systematic reviewTooth restorationsPulp.
原始语种摘要: Search result: Three clinical trials with a laboratory component were found.Clinical outcomes: There appears to be no difference in the pulp response between conventional GIC and CaOH-cement (CaOH is considered to be the gold standard in pulp treatment due to its high tissue supporting properties. Lack of difference between C-GIC and CaOH suggest high biocompatibility of C-GIC concerning pulp tissue).State of evidence and recommendations: The current level of clinical evidence to this topic is still limited in quantity and more trials are needed in order to confirm these results. The quality of the existing evidence requires further assessment.[‘Preliminary Systematic Literature Searches’ are based on SYSTEM’s periodic systematic searches of the dental literature and provide first...
全文获取路径: Midentistry 

  • hydroxide 氢氧化物
  • cement 胶结物
  • result 成果
  • treatment 处理
  • conventional 常规
  • standard 标准
  • systematic 有系统的
  • difference 区别
  • quality 品质
  • literature 文献