Commercial competence: comparing test results of paper-and-pencil versus computer-based assessments
作者: Julia Sangmeister
作者单位: 1German Institute for Adult Education-Leibniz Centre for Lifelong Learning
刊名: Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 2017, Vol.9 (1), pp.1-19
来源数据库: Springer Nature Journal
DOI: 10.1186/s40461-017-0047-2
关键词: Computer-based assessmentDifferential item functioning (DIF)Mode-effectCommercial competenceValidity
英文摘要: Abstract(#br) Background(#br)Vocational education and training (VET) aims to enable young adults or trainees to participate in the workplace, and to promote their vocational capacities. In order to examine trainees’ competencies at the end of VET, appropriate instruments are needed. This contribution aims: (1) to give an outline of such an instrument, one that has been designed to evaluate vocational competencies in the field of economics, and (2) to present the results of an empirical comparison of two possible test modes: computer-based assessment (CBA) versus paper-based assessment (PBA). The use of new technologies offers various opportunities for competence measurement: in particular, the computer as an assessment tool presents an authentic work tool drawn from professional life and...
全文获取路径: Springer Nature  (合作)

  • pencil 
  • comparing 比较
  • paper 
  • competence 强性
  • computer 电子计算机
  • based 基于
  • results 成果
  • versus