Evolution of land use-change modeling: routes of different schools of knowledge
作者: Hossein AzadiAli Akbar BaratiParisa RafiaaniFatemeh TaheriKindeya GebrehiwotFrank WitloxPhilippe Lebailly
作者单位: 1Hasselt University
2University of Liège
3Ghent University
4University of Tehran
5Khuzestan Ramin Agricultural and Natural Resources University
6Mekelle University
刊名: Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 2017, Vol.13 (2), pp.319-332
来源数据库: Springer Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s11355-016-0311-9
关键词: Environmental planningLand managementLand useModelingKnowledge schoolSustainable land use
英文摘要: Although much has been published on land use-change models (LUCMs), no study has comprehensively dealt with the evolution of land use models based on schools of knowledge. The primary objective of this paper is an explanation of the progress and growth of LUCMs concerning their main ontological, epistemological, and methodological origins. Five main paradigms, i.e., positivism, post-positivism, constructivism, participatory, and pragmatism approaches, are discussed in order to assess the current orientations of LUCMs. Given the complexities of LUCM components, the study concludes that one paradigm cannot adequately address all methodological aspects. Accordingly, it is necessary to combine quantitative and qualitative paradigms to create mixed-method approaches within a systemic...
原始语种摘要: Although much has been published on land use-change models (LUCMs), no study has comprehensively dealt with the evolution of land use models based on schools of knowledge. The primary objective of this paper is an explanation of the progress and growth of LUCMs concerning their main ontological, epistemological, and methodological origins. Five main paradigms, i.e., positivism, post-positivism, constructivism, participatory, and pragmatism approaches, are discussed in order to assess the current orientations of LUCMs. Given the complexities of LUCM components, the study concludes that one paradigm cannot adequately address all methodological aspects. Accordingly, it is necessary to combine quantitative and qualitative paradigms to create mixed-method approaches within a systemic...
全文获取路径: Springer  (合作)
分享到:
来源刊物:
影响因子:0.923 (2012)

×
关键词翻译
关键词翻译
  • school 学校
  • methodological 方法论的
  • change 变化
  • knowledge 知识
  • management 管理
  • positivism 实证论
  • socioeconomic 社会经济学
  • combine 联合收割机
  • explanation 说明
  • necessary 必要的