Multiple criteria decision analysis in the context of health technology assessment: a simulation exercise on metastatic colorectal cancer with multiple stakeholders in the English setting
作者: Aris AngelisGilberto MontibellerDaniel HochhauserPanos Kanavos
作者单位: 1Department of Health Policy and Medical Technology Research Group, LSE Health, London School of Economics and Political Science
2Loughborough University
3UCL Cancer Institute
刊名: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2017, Vol.17 (1)
来源数据库: Springer Journal
DOI: 10.1186/s12911-017-0524-3
关键词: Multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA)Health technology assessment (HTA)Advance Value Framework (AVF)Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)EnglandNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)Value assessmentNew medicines
英文摘要: Multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) has appeared as a methodology to address limitations of economic evaluation in health technology assessment (HTA), however there are limited empirical evidence from real world applications. The aim of this study is to test in practice a recently developed MCDA methodological framework known as Advance Value Framework (AVF) through a proof-of-concept case study engaging multiple stakeholders.
原始语种摘要: Multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) has appeared as a methodology to address limitations of economic evaluation in health technology assessment (HTA), however there are limited empirical evidence from real world applications. The aim of this study is to test in practice a recently developed MCDA methodological framework known as Advance Value Framework (AVF) through a proof-of-concept case study engaging multiple stakeholders.
全文获取路径: Springer  (合作)
分享到:
来源刊物:
影响因子:1.603 (2012)

×
关键词翻译
关键词翻译
  • decision 决定
  • assessment 评价
  • technology 工艺
  • criteria 准则
  • methodological 方法论的
  • analysis 分析
  • multiple 多次的
  • empirical 经验的
  • methodology 方法学
  • economic 经济的