Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy versus Conventional Excision Hemorrhoidectomy for Acute Hemorrhoidal Crisis
作者: Huang-Jen LaiShu-Wen JaoChin-Cheng SuMing-Che LeeJung-Cheng Kang
作者单位: 1Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital
2Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Tzu Chi University
刊名: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2007, Vol.11 (12), pp.1654-1661
来源数据库: Springer Nature Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0259-z
关键词: Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoidsStapled hemorrhoidectomyHemorrhoidsCrisis
英文摘要: Abstract(#br)We compared the safety and clinical outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidectomy and conventional excision hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of acute hemorrhoidal crisis, and analyzed various factors associated with complications in stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Forty patients underwent stapled hemorrhoidectomy and forty underwent conventional excision hemorrhoidectomy. All had the operation under local anesthesia with conscious sedation within 24 h of admission. The length of surgery, hospital stay, disability, postoperative pain, and the use of analgesics were significantly less for patients in the stapled hemorrhoidectomy group. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy did not significantly increase the rate of complications. Five patients in the stapled group (12.5%) required further surgical...
全文获取路径: Springer Nature  (合作)
影响因子:2.361 (2012)

  • versus