Quantification of aortic stenosis diagnostic parameters: comparison of fast 3 direction and 1 direction phase contrast CMR and transthoracic echocardiography
作者: Juliana Serafim da SilveiraMatthew SmykeAdam V. RichYingmin LiuNing JinDebbie ScandlingJennifer A. DickersonCarlos E. RochitteSubha V. RamanLee C. PotterRizwan AhmadOrlando P. Simonetti
作者单位: 1The Ohio State University
2University of São Paulo Medical School
3Siemens Healthcare
刊名: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2017, Vol.19 (1)
来源数据库: Springer Nature Journal
DOI: 10.1186/s12968-017-0339-5
关键词: Phase contrast imagingMulti-directional phase contrast CMRBayesian modelAortic stenosisTransthoracic echocardiography
原始语种摘要: Aortic stenosis (AS) is a common valvular disorder, and disease severity is currently assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). However, TTE results can be inconsistent in some patients, thus other diagnostic modalities such as cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) are demanded. While traditional unidirectional phase-contrast CMR (1Dir PC-CMR) underestimates velocity if the imaging plane is misaligned to the flow direction, multi-directional acquisitions are expected to improve velocity measurement accuracy. Nonetheless, clinical use of multidirectional techniques has been hindered by long acquisition times. Our goal was to quantify flow parameters in patients using 1Dir PC-CMR and a faster multi-directional technique (3Dir PC-CMR), and compare to TTE.
全文获取路径: Springer Nature  (合作)
影响因子:4.435 (2012)

  • stenosis 压缩
  • transthoracic 经胸廓的
  • contrast 差异
  • CMR CoMmand Register
  • imaging 图像形成
  • direction 方向
  • resonance 共振
  • parameters 参数
  • valvular 壳瓣的
  • diagnostic 诊断的