Management of large renal stones: laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy
作者: Yunjin BaiYin TangLan DengXiaoming WangYubo YangJia WangPing Han
作者单位: 1West China Hospital, Sichuan University
刊名: BMC Urology, 2017, Vol.17 (1)
来源数据库: Springer Nature Journal
DOI: 10.1186/s12894-017-0266-7
关键词: Laparoscopic pyelolithotomyPercutaneous nephrolithotomyRenal stoneMeta-analysis
英文摘要: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) remains the standard procedure for large (≥2 cm) renal calculi; however, laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LPL) can be used as an alternative management procedure. The aim of present study was to compare LPL and PCNL in terms of efficacy and safety for the management of large renal pelvic stones.
原始语种摘要: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) remains the standard procedure for large (≥2 cm) renal calculi; however, laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LPL) can be used as an alternative management procedure. The aim of present study was to compare LPL and PCNL in terms of efficacy and safety for the management of large renal pelvic stones.
全文获取路径: Springer Nature  (合作)
分享到:
来源刊物:
影响因子:1.694 (2012)

×
关键词翻译
关键词翻译
  • pyelolithotomy 肾盂石切除术
  • renal 肾的
  • calculi 计算法
  • large 大的
  • percutaneous 经皮的
  • management 管理
  • pelvic 腰带
  • versus 
  • alternative 可选择的
  • terms 术语