Clinical drug trials in general practice: how well are external validity issues reported?
作者: Anja Maria BrændJørund StraandAtle Klovning
作者单位: 1University of Oslo
刊名: BMC Family Practice, 2017, Vol.18 (1)
来源数据库: Springer Nature Journal
DOI: 10.1186/s12875-017-0680-7
关键词: General practiceClinical trialsExternal validityApplicabilityGeneralizabilityEligibility determination
英文摘要: When reading a report of a clinical trial, it should be possible to judge whether the results are relevant for your patients. Issues affecting the external validity or generalizability of a trial should therefore be reported. Our aim was to determine whether articles with published results from a complete cohort of drug trials conducted entirely or partly in general practice reported sufficient information about the trials to consider the external validity.
原始语种摘要: When reading a report of a clinical trial, it should be possible to judge whether the results are relevant for your patients. Issues affecting the external validity or generalizability of a trial should therefore be reported. Our aim was to determine whether articles with published results from a complete cohort of drug trials conducted entirely or partly in general practice reported sufficient information about the trials to consider the external validity.
全文获取路径: Springer Nature  (合作)
分享到:
来源刊物:
影响因子:1.609 (2012)

×
关键词翻译
关键词翻译
  • validity 有效
  • external 外部的
  • practice 实践
  • reading 读出
  • general 普遍的
  • determination 测定
  • whether 是否
  • published 公布的
  • articles 用品
  • entirely 完全地