Small winners and big losers: strategic party behaviour in the 2017 Dutch general election
作者: Mathilde M. van DitmarsNicola MagginiJoost van Spanje
作者单位: 1Department of Political Science , University of Lucerne , Lucerne , Switzerland
2;Department of Legal Sciences , University of Florence , Florence , Italy
3;Amsterdam School of Communication Research, Department of Communication Science , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
刊名: West European Politics, 2020, Vol.43 (3), pp.543-564
来源数据库: Taylor & Francis Journal
DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2019.1655959
关键词: 2017 Dutch general electionIssue-yield theoryParty competitionIssue competitionParty strategy
原始语种摘要: Abstract(#br)This article analyses party strategies during the campaign for the Dutch general election of March 2017, making use of issue-yield theory. It investigates whether parties strategically emphasise high-yield issues, by juxtaposing the issue opportunities provided by voters with parties’ issue emphasis during the campaign. More specifically, it asks whether parties strategically emphasised issues that were expected to reward them electorally. Analysing voter preferences and party campaign data, it is found that parties and most of their constituencies show high ideological consistency, that parties emphasise mostly positional issues and thus choose a conflict-mobilising strategy, and that most parties emphasise high-yield issues rather than following the general political...
全文获取路径: Taylor & Francis  (合作)
分享到:
来源刊物:

×
关键词翻译
关键词翻译
  • election 推选
  • party 
  • Dutch 荷兰的
  • general 普遍的
  • ideological 意识形态
  • campaign 连续操妆间
  • hardly 几乎不
  • competition 竞争
  • strategically 战略上
  • strategy 战略