Comparison of Weighting-Rating-Calculating, Best Value, and Choosing by Advantages for Bidder Selection
作者: Annett SchöttlePaz Arroyo
作者单位: 1Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
2Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
刊名: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2017, Vol.143 (8)
来源数据库: The American Society of Civil Engineers Journal
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001342
关键词: Tendering procedureMulticriteria decision-makingWeighting-rating-calculatingBest value selectionChoosing by advantagesContracting
原始语种摘要: AbstractSelecting the best bidder during a tendering procedure is key to project success. However, the methods used for decision making and their implications are not well understood. This study presents a theoretical and case-based comparison of three multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methods—weighting-rating-calculating (WRC), best value selection (BVS), and choosing by advantages (CBA)—to illustrate the impact of these methods on the tendering procedure. The authors explain the benefits of using CBA and why it is superior to WRC and BVS for avoiding the speculative behavior of bidders. The results of the applied sensitivity analysis provide evidence that superior methods, such as CBA, do not mix cost and value, because generally the price significantly impacts the decision...
全文获取路径: ASCE 
分享到:

×
关键词翻译
关键词翻译
  • speculative 推测性
  • decision 决定
  • multicriteria 多指标
  • price 价格
  • risky 危险
  • tendering 脆化
  • making 制定
  • technical 技术的
  • score 得分
  • CBA Cargo Boarding Advisory