Why does the history of economic thought neglect Post-Keynesian economics?
作者: Danielle Guizzo
作者单位: 1Senior Lecturer in Economics, Accounting, Economics and Finance Department, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
刊名: Review of Keynesian Economics, 2020, Vol.8 (1), pp.119-137
来源数据库: Edward Elgar Publishing
DOI: 10.4337/roke.2020.01.09
关键词: Post-Keynesian economicsHistory of economic thoughtHistory of recent economicsPost-war macroeconomicsTraditional heterodoxyNew heterodoxy
原始语种摘要: Despite receiving increased interest after the global financial crisis of 2007–2008 and consolidating itself as an established research program, Post-Keynesian economics remains under-represented within publications on the history of economics. When compared to other traditional heterodox approaches such as Marxist, Institutionalist, and Austrian economics, Post-Keynesian economics falls behind considerably, contradicting the Post-Keynesian appreciation for the history of the discipline. This article explores some reasons behind this detachment by considering two main factors: first, the recent disciplinary and institutional changes experienced by the history of economics in the last ten years; and, second, the recent ‘maturing state’ of Post-Keynesian economics and its unique treatment...
全文获取路径: EE 

  • economics 经济学
  • heterodoxy 异端
  • history 历史
  • thought 思索
  • institutional 惯例的
  • discipline 锻炼
  • making 制定
  • behind 在后
  • research 
  • recent 近来的